What is dualism, it’s effect and how to let it go

Avec : Richard Rohr
contemplation dualism

Questions / Réponses

Extraits marquants

Résumé

That's the beginnings of blindness, because all words are metaphors.

Sous-titres

WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.240 --> 00:00:04.669
The word dualism is
unfortunately not familiar that

2
00:00:04.669 --> 00:00:07.830
much to Western people,
although it should be.

3
00:00:07.830 --> 00:00:11.900
But I think it reveals the fact
that we're so comfortable

4
00:00:11.900 --> 00:00:15.589
inside of dualistic thinking
that we don't recognize it for

5
00:00:15.589 --> 00:00:17.760
the problem that it is.

6
00:00:17.760 --> 00:00:22.669
The mind is a binary system,
and it looks at everything in

7
00:00:22.669 --> 00:00:27.420
terms of short / tall,
black / white,

8
00:00:27.420 --> 00:00:31.410
Catholic / Protestant,
gay / straight.

9
00:00:31.410 --> 00:00:34.850
And most people are entirely
comfortable with that because

10
00:00:34.850 --> 00:00:38.449
it gives them the sort of
minimal clarity that gives them

11
00:00:38.449 --> 00:00:40.020
a sense of control.

12
00:00:40.020 --> 00:00:43.950
But the trouble is,
it's not true.

13
00:00:43.950 --> 00:00:46.329
Things are never that simple.

14
00:00:46.329 --> 00:00:48.960
There's gradations in between.

15
00:00:48.960 --> 00:00:52.189
I was told by a doctor that
when a little two year old

16
00:00:52.189 --> 00:00:56.449
first hears the word tall,
the only way they can process

17
00:00:56.449 --> 00:00:59.989
that without knowing that,
of course, is to distinguish

18
00:00:59.989 --> 00:01:01.380
it from short.

19
00:01:01.380 --> 00:01:04.590
Now that's all a little
two year old needs.

20
00:01:04.590 --> 00:01:08.719
But in fact, as you grow up,
you learn there's huge degrees

21
00:01:08.719 --> 00:01:12.649
between a tall person and a
short person, and you sort of

22
00:01:12.649 --> 00:01:14.159
accept that subtlety.

23
00:01:14.159 --> 00:01:19.140
But for all practical purposes,
we stay with that binary language

24
00:01:19.140 --> 00:01:21.620
and then it gets worse, we think,

25
00:01:21.620 --> 00:01:26.459
because we choose one side,
and once you choose it,

26
00:01:26.459 --> 00:01:28.120
you prefer it.

27
00:01:28.120 --> 00:01:32.989
And all I have to do is tell people
don't take my word for it.

28
00:01:32.989 --> 00:01:34.469
You watch your mind.

29
00:01:34.469 --> 00:01:41.010
As soon as you say any kind
of split, you always, within a nanosecond,

30
00:01:41.010 --> 00:01:44.640
judge one side to be higher
and one side to be lower.

31
00:01:44.640 --> 00:01:48.450
That's the beginning
of blindness,

32
00:01:48.450 --> 00:01:51.379
because people talk,
not realizing all

33
00:01:51.379 --> 00:01:52.700
words are metaphors.

34
00:01:52.700 --> 00:01:54.420
All words are metaphors.

35
00:01:54.420 --> 00:01:57.930
There's no other thing
except metaphorical language.

36
00:01:57.930 --> 00:02:01.250
But then we take those
metaphors as if they were

37
00:02:01.250 --> 00:02:06.569
a true, objective, metaphysical
description of the thing.

38
00:02:06.569 --> 00:02:11.159
So this makes for
very incomplete perception.

39
00:02:11.159 --> 00:02:15.920
And unfortunately, the politics
and the psychology that follows

40
00:02:15.920 --> 00:02:17.969
from it is even worse.

41
00:02:17.969 --> 00:02:22.469
So what we teach here at the
Center for Action and Contemplation

42
00:02:22.469 --> 00:02:26.280
is to teach people, frankly,
how to contemplate,

43
00:02:26.280 --> 00:02:33.920
which is to live in the whole picture
where you catch yourself splitting

44
00:02:33.920 --> 00:02:37.199
and dividing and identifying
with one side.

45
00:02:37.199 --> 00:02:42.150
And basically, you practice
not doing that.

46
00:02:42.150 --> 00:02:45.509
You leave the field of the
moment open, you see.

47
00:02:45.509 --> 00:02:50.639
That takes surrender and it
takes practice because the ego

48
00:02:50.639 --> 00:02:52.920
likes to identify with
one side.

49
00:02:52.920 --> 00:02:55.199
I don't know why
that's true, but it does.

50
00:02:55.199 --> 00:03:00.330
And presume that
one side is always better.

51
00:03:00.330 --> 00:03:02.250
This is getting us nowhere.

52
00:03:02.250 --> 00:03:05.120
I mean, here in America,
as you know, we just went

53
00:03:05.120 --> 00:03:06.870
through 18 months of this.

54
00:03:06.870 --> 00:03:09.170
So here we are,
a country with universities,

55
00:03:09.170 --> 00:03:13.889
churches everywhere and at the
highest levels of the United States,

56
00:03:13.889 --> 00:03:17.550
we found out most people,
even people with PhDs

57
00:03:17.550 --> 00:03:21.360
on the left or the right,
are still dualistic thinkers.

58
00:03:22.379 --> 00:03:24.939
So we got our work cut out for us.

content.front.transcript_toggle

The word dualism is unfortunately not familiar that much to Western people, although it should be. But I think it reveals the fact that we're so comfortable inside of dualistic thinking that we don't recognize it for the problem that it is. The mind is a binary system, and it looks at everything in terms of short / tall, black / white, Catholic / Protestant, gay / straight. And most people are entirely comfortable with that because it gives them the sort of minimal clarity that gives them a sense of control. But the trouble is, it's not true. Things are never that simple. There's gradations in between. I was told by a doctor that when a little two year old first hears the word tall, the only way they can process that without knowing that, of course, is to distinguish it from short. Now that's all a little two year old needs. But in fact, as you grow up, you learn there's huge degrees between a tall person and a short person, and you sort of accept that subtlety. But for all practical purposes, we stay with that binary language and then it gets worse, we think, because we choose one side, and once you choose it, you prefer it. And all I have to do is tell people don't take my word for it. You watch your mind. As soon as you say any kind of split, you always, within a nanosecond, judge one side to be higher and one side to be lower. That's the beginning of blindness, because people talk, not realizing all words are metaphors. All words are metaphors. There's no other thing except metaphorical language. But then we take those metaphors as if they were a true, objective, metaphysical description of the thing. So this makes for very incomplete perception. And unfortunately, the politics and the psychology that follows from it is even worse. So what we teach here at the Center for Action and Contemplation is to teach people, frankly, how to contemplate, which is to live in the whole picture where you catch yourself splitting and dividing and identifying with one side. And basically, you practice not doing that. You leave the field of the moment open, you see. That takes surrender and it takes practice because the ego likes to identify with one side. I don't know why that's true, but it does. And presume that one side is always better. This is getting us nowhere. I mean, here in America, as you know, we just went through 18 months of this. So here we are, a country with universities, churches everywhere and at the highest levels of the United States, we found out most people, even people with PhDs on the left or the right, are still dualistic thinkers. So we got our work cut out for us.